▲ -5 ▼ There needs to be a global login button for Mastodon/Lemmy (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by orientalsniper@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments Like two text fields, with the server/instance field autofilling: username @ server
[–] orientalsniper@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) A global login wouldn't break a defedaration, it would simply spit out some error such as "Your credentials are invalid, your home instance is not federated with this instance." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Well yes, but most of the instances we federate with aren't queer or gender diverse. And the reason we pay for the costs of our instance out of our own pockets is because we are interested in fostering and developing our community of folk who are queer and gender diverse permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orientalsniper@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's great and all, but it still wouldn't disrupt any of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 years ago It wouldn't disrupt it, but it would mean that I would see an influx of users that I have to pay for, that have no interest or involvement with the community that I'm trying to nurture permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Well yes, but most of the instances we federate with aren't queer or gender diverse. And the reason we pay for the costs of our instance out of our own pockets is because we are interested in fostering and developing our community of folk who are queer and gender diverse permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orientalsniper@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's great and all, but it still wouldn't disrupt any of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 years ago It wouldn't disrupt it, but it would mean that I would see an influx of users that I have to pay for, that have no interest or involvement with the community that I'm trying to nurture permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orientalsniper@lemmy.world [S] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's great and all, but it still wouldn't disrupt any of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 years ago It wouldn't disrupt it, but it would mean that I would see an influx of users that I have to pay for, that have no interest or involvement with the community that I'm trying to nurture permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 years ago It wouldn't disrupt it, but it would mean that I would see an influx of users that I have to pay for, that have no interest or involvement with the community that I'm trying to nurture permalink fedilink source parent