Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday called on the federal government to move “as quickly as possible” to change the way it officially classifies marijuana, saying that “nobody should have to go to jail for smoking weed.”

“I cannot emphasize enough that they need to get to it as quickly as possible,” Harris said. “We need to have a resolution based on their findings and their assessment. This issue is stark when one considers the fact that on the schedule currently, marijuana is considered as dangerous as heroin ― as dangerous as heroin ― and more dangerous than fentanyl, which is absurd, not to mention patently unfair.”

Marijuana is currently listed as a Schedule 1 drug by the Drug Enforcement Administration. That classification designates it one of the most dangerous drugs possible, with no medicinal uses. Other substances in the same category include heroin, ecstasy and LSD. Marijuana advocates have been pushing for years for the federal government to either reschedule marijuana to a different category or deschedule it entirely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Lemmy sees something good happen:

"Not good enough!"

We all know it should have happened before, but dismissing that the vice president just publicly called for this is silly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Biden campaigned on rescheduling it so this is just nakedly trying to boost their pre-election popularity. They could've done this day one. They didn't. They won't.

    Web archive of Biden's campaign site, September 2019: http://web.archive.org/web/20190723224533/https://joebiden.com/justice/

    Decriminalize the use of cannabis and automatically expunge all prior cannabis use convictions. Biden believes no one should be in jail because of cannabis use. As president, he will decriminalize cannabis use and automatically expunge prior convictions. And, he will support the legalization of cannabis for medical purposes, leave decisions regarding legalization for recreational use up to the states, and reschedule cannabis as a schedule II drug so researchers can study its positive and negative impacts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Biden: Holds the trump card that is almost guaranteed to get him reelected

    Yall: WhY dIdN't He UsE iT sOoNeR

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    He started the work in 2022. You think he just started it? Did you not read the links I provided?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't say he just started. Thanks for putting words in my mouth. I said he knows that if he made weed legal too early the stoners would forget about it and potentially not vote.

    Playing the trump card right before elections? Everyone is in a super high (lol) and is super in the mood to vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Cannabis prohibition is still harming the communities it was designed to disrupt.

    But none of the people in those communities matter. Let them needlessly suffer for our stupid timing games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I also never said it was the best course of action for the betterment of people. Just politically. Which I don't agree with but understand

    But please, keep painting me as terrible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I also never said it was the best course of action for the betterment of people.

    The problem here is that this isn't even a consideration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    pol·i·tics /ˈpäləˌtiks/ noun: the activities associated with the governance of a country or other area, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping to achieve power.

    from the Greek poli meaning many and tick, a blood sucking parasite.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They've been "calling for it" since Biden campaign. And reschedule? It should be descheduled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And the DEA is actively working on it, which just so happens to be the final step in rescheduling a drug.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I work in the space industry and this just reeks of the "hurry up and wait" that I live in. If the right pressure was there, it'd be rescheduled already. I'm 50/50 on if they are actually working on it or if feet are being dragged due to institutional friction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I hate it here for that reason. With this being the last option, I've reverted to Google News, NYTimes and SF Chronicle apps. Lemmy's inability to feel joy has helped me ditch social media most of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Reddit very seriously had the same problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They won't. They've been fucking around on this for at least 12 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Oh sure, every 4 years Lucy comes out with the football and taunts you to take a run at it and I’m the one not being realistic. It’s total horseshit to disappear on an issue every 4 years except when you think it might help you in an election to wave it around.

    It’s not “Lemmy sees something good happen”; nothing good has happened. The same platitudes have been trotted out for the 78th time. But maybe this time…!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The words of a politician are not accomplishments.

    If it ever gets descheduled, it'll be an accomplishment. I'm not going to treat announcements as accomplishments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Public discourse from a sitting executive politician represents progress. It is not enough yet, but it is progress. In years past such statements would have been massively disruptive, and via speech like this the topic is being normalized.

    It's not enough yet. We arenf done

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Stop expecting me to believe that politicians' lies are progress just because you believe them.

    It's not an accomplishment until it's accomplished.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Just because you don't understand the power of normalized discourse doesn't mean I have some obligation to you.

    I'm just telling you how reality works.

    Edit im proud to hear more discussion of climate, LGBT, drug decrim and other issues, at increasingly public and increasingly executive levels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I know the difference between hot air and accomplishments. You're not going to gaslight me into accepting the former as the latter. All you're doing is convincing me that you prefer words to accomplishments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    50 years ago a woman, non-white politician wouldn't have been a common thing. Part of how we got to where we are today is via public, popularized discourse.

    The same occurs in this article and the speech that lead to it.

    It doesn't mean the world is changing in an active sense, but it does mean the conversation is happening. This is part of the power of executive office.

    I'm sorry you had to learn about this from me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We lost roe because we only talked about codifying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    We GOT roe because we discussed it.

    Edit auto

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We got roe because we had a court willing to do it.

    We don't anymore. Accepting talk instead of accomplishments has lost us ground. And since all Democrats do is talk, that loss is permanent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're missing the point.

    The point, for your roe v Wade example is that at one point speaking of abortion in public, let alone politically was unthinkable. Due to some brave people, and eventually people in political office, SPEAKING ABOUT the issue made it viable.

    Of course there are many other factors, and many other brave and impactful people.

    But speech is political action, no question.

    But it's not enough, on it's own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And if we accept talk as accomplished fact, we don't move beyond talk.

    Meanwhile, Republicans act while we content ourselves with talk. And we lose Roe.

    And we'll keep only talking about ending the racist drug war and never actually ending it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments