234
The CIA proving the necessity of China's Great Firewall once again (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/news@hexbear.net
165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago* (32 children)

"Can you state, in your own words, what points I've made?"

Okay, you know what? If you're going to keep editing your comments like this after I reply in order to make it look like I'm not answering your other points then, no, I'm not going to bother.

Stop adding things to your comments like that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
    •
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (31 children)

    I didn't edit my comment... I think that's verifiable in Lemmy's metadata and edit status at least used to show up on the web interface before I began using native mobile clients.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (30 children)

    I know what I saw.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
    •
  • [+] 26 points 2 years ago (10 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)

    No they're not. Stop gas-lighting. I know what I saw.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [+] 27 points 2 years ago (7 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    Prove it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] 24 points 2 years ago* (4 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Alright, you're right.

    I've had several do it to me, but I guess it didn't happen this time.

    Regardless, I stand by what I said: he shouldn't be declaring his viewpoints or opinions popular.

    And they should stop being argumentative with me whenever we interact with each other; the only time they interact with me is to argue and it's annoying, to the point where I wonder if they're trolling.

    Thanks for hearing me out and being patient with me.

    Good day. I've already blocked.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago (18 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    No need for this weird paranoia-jacketing

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago (16 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    I disagree that you can call a person "paranoid" for being defensive online. You should not throw those terms around Willy nilly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    How about making up conspiracies of other users editing their comments to confuse and attack you but being hackers in the code who can hide their edits? Saying stuff like “I know it’s you you did this before” to people accusing them of nonsense? That qualify?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    No, that's just being very defensive. We shouldn't treat mental diagnosis as insults and we should not insinuate that because someone is weird online that there's something psychiatrically wrong with them

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (12 children)

    It’s not defensive to flatly deny evident reality in front of their face. They know how edits look, they are a mod and long time site user. Why are they going around accusing people of editing who don’t have edit symbols? Do they think the site is lying to them and in on the conspiracy?

    How am I the one “jacketing” and not them? They are the ones accusing people of absurd things and dramabaiting

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (11 children)

    I am not saying that they are not jacketing, I have not spoken about the quality of their behaviour at all. I agree with you that they're being shitty, I just don't think it's cool to do what you did in response.
    I don't know why they're being weird about edits that did not happen. I just know that that doesn't warrant implying they're mentally ill

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    When someone is plainly disconnected from evidence and reality and digging into a “it’s not me it’s literally everyone else gaslighting me and attacking me and persecuting me” mentality there’s really not much other explanation

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Sure, whatever. I still do not think that justifies doing as you did, which is why I wrote the response that I did.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    I’ll be real, I just don’t like Pluto and took the opportunity of them being a fucking weirdo to dunk on them. It makes a lot of sense why he’s always complaining about the “Nazbols” taking over hexbear and taking over his org and taking over the internet, I will just say that much

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The only issue was the ableism (using mental illness as a dunk or insult is ableism). I wish we had a word for paranoid that didn’t have those implications but we don’t.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    I never said the word paranoid.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    https://hexbear.net/comment/4702153

    Sure you didn’t bud. I count two.

    Either way, I wasn’t the one who originally removed the comments, I simply agree with the removal. The ableism on this site really should be the next great purge. If only we had a TC69 figure to spearhead it.

    Have a nice day Z poster

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    that was in response to them saying it, i was quoting them. I guess I did say the word technically, but I didn't bring it up

    it's zed proclaimer, don't know who this "z poster" is but its just an smear word like "tankie" or "nazbol"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I was wrong, went ahead and reapproved them because, in my personal understanding, fault would lie with the first to introduce the term. I’ve been a bit on edge with all the ableism lately and jumped the gun after checking the mod log and seeing “it still going”. Apologies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Yeah and I don't mind that you dunked I think it was well deserved. I just dislike the ableism inherent in saying "oh I bet you're being gangstalked too huh". I think it's shitty to use signs of mental diagnosis as dunks.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent