this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
153 points (97.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43903 readers
1040 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The paradox introduced by threads like these is that they flood the communities with shit.
It’s like when you build a really good road or freeway. Everyone starts using it and now it’s not good anymore.
To me, real excellence is self evident and doesn’t need to be recommended outright
I take this point to heart. I have no problem with respectful individuals trying to better themselves through enrichment, and hope that the diversity of Lemmy communities translates to bastions of high quality standards not possible on centralized platforms like Reddit. Like anything innovative and somewhat disruptive, Lemmy is another social experiment. Personally I’m optimistic that moderators of many communities will maintain high QC and exclusivity.
The thing is everyone has a limit with what they can deal with, are shaped by repeated interactions, etc etc.
We need solid systems in place that work and secure integrity of operation inherently - with or without “good” moderators or admins or owners etc
I don’t disagree. I believe that systems not relying on trust, if cleverly designed, can be simultaneously robust, selective, and autonomously correcting. That being said, the forum format itself, while having inherent drawbacks, is my preferred version of the modern commons for different reasons. It’s not the Platonic ideal of the digital commons, nor, hopefully its last iteration, but I’m hoping Lemmy produces superior communities to Reddit, for instance, simply due to their diversity and decentralized governance.
I applaud your optimism. And you're right. The design of the fediverse encourages these properties. But there are also other dynamics at play.
I wouldn't describe Lemmy as an intellectual place. It's more a cross-sectional take on society. It's a diverse place of common folks, a few nerds, people posting the news, sharing memes or asking questions...
It depends a bit on the specific community. Some have nice people and active conversation, some don't. Especially niche topics are a mixed bag. We're just 50.000 active users so that means for some smaller hobbies you can't really get a conversation going. But you included some broad topics. I'm sure some of them work well here.
[email protected] regularly has good posts. Debate and politics work very well all across the platform... I'm not really an expert on the communities here, I hope other people can give good recommendations. Art, literature and ecology also have healthy communities. Sometimes entire instaces dedicated to it.
I think if you're willing to share this place with a diverse group of people, you can get happy here.