this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
247 points (94.9% liked)

News

23275 readers
3454 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

We censoring books or not? I vote not. Is it so hard to be consistent?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can't seriously be against all censorship in books, right? Where are your actual boundaries? I don't think you'd be ok with something obviously evil like a book of cp.... Right?

Edgecases are why it's hard to be consistent.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That’s illegal and for good reason.

Yet somehow the US functions with freedom of speech even with some restrictions.

But we’re not talking about CP are we? We’re taking about how we are still dealing with rightoids censoring books and now the left wants certain ones censored.

I argued against the right censoring books and I’ll continue to argue the same way, regardless of who the next shitty group trying it is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

That's my point though. If you don't ban (aka censor) illegal things as a foundation, you end up living in a hellscape. I'm saying your argument isn't thorough enough. It's not going far enough. It's scratching the surface and saying "good enough" when it doesn't actually appear to be.

I am talking about illegal things because it's an obvious hole in your argument. What are you talking about about? Because it sounds like you're being short sighted to me, sticking to a happy path, but I could be wrong. What do you think?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, let's put "Der Giftpilz", meaning "The poisonous mushroom" - a German children's book from 1938 - up for sale everywhere.

Children should learn how Jews are the poisonous mushrooms of humanity because they rape German girls, killed Jesus and doom humanity if we don't find a solution to the Jewish Question.

This book can be legally sold in the US.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It almost as if education and critical thinking about what one is reading is important.

That book can be read to children in the context of it being wrong. It can be explained to children why it is wrong and that just because they read something in a book doesn't mean it's right.

What's better, educating people to think critically, or banning things so they don't have to think at all?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I'm sure this will be the reason anyone purchases this book.

Besides you don't expose children to Polio to strengthen their immune system, you give them a weakened version. The beautifully illustrated book with arguments which sound logical to children, tons of non-verbal messaging and countless hateful stereotypes is not how you educate children.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A conservative could say the same thing with a different book.

Stop trying to ban books.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They will ban books regardless of whether harmful books are banned.

Freedom of speech doesn't extend to incitement of hatred. If it does, your laws don't protect freedom of speech as much as they protect the freedom to call for, and eventually cause, genocide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Free speech DOES extend to hatred, though.

Did y'all forget the ACLU once defended the National Socialist Party of America's right to free speech?

If you expect your right to say "fuck the police" or wear a shirt emblazoned with the same, you can't go around saying the law should keep someone from wearing a swastika. BOTH are protected by the right to free speech, as much as you and much of the left don't want to admit it.

I stand for the PRINCIPLE of free speech rather than wheeling it out to defend speech I like but then pretending like it doesn't exist to suppress speech I don't.

In order to preempt some of the more predictable responses to this, no, private companies cannot violate your right to free speech - only the government can. So if the book company in the OP decides to stop selling some books, I would not consider it to be violating free speech. But I think the conversation has strayed from that specific instance at this point.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

According to the Paradox of tolerance from an above poster, you cannot be fully tolerant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Twitter people pointed out that Mein Kampf is sold there, but it's a historic book and valuable to read to understand the roots of fascism to fight it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Mein Kampf is a pretty poor source to understand the roots of fascism. People have this idea, that Hitler was some elaborate writer, who laid out a comprehensive and enchanting piece of work, that was then surrounded by mysticism.

You don't understand the roots of fascism from books written by fascists. You understand it from looking at fascists in action, both on the side of agitators and those following the agitation. And the roots are pretty simple: Combine fear with hatred and an inferiority complex, mix it with simple solutions and by elevating individuals of the in-group by terrorizing the out-group.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah people should have access to the nutjob right wing shit as a learning tool. Can't defeat your enemy unless you understand them.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not censorship if it's words by people you dislike, silly! Everyone with a real education knows that!

(Edit: /s because I guess someone might say this unironically?)