Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn't have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Exactly. The mainstream male culture is too toxic to admit that yeah some are mutilated and even if it's not a big deal on average these people did have their rights taken away from them and their identity invaded without consent.

Maybe there would be more success with a softer word instead of mutilated but then there's a risk of people pushing this away as "not a big deal".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    Seriously not even that hard of an area to rinse. I actually wonder how much sensitivity men lose because it it. Articles keep saying it doesn't reduce sexual satisfaction but I cant walk around with my foreskin pulled back all day. It would dry out and hurt like crazy as soon as I put on clothes. There has to be some loss to men that were mutilated and no one wants to admit they are missing out.

  • source
  • parent