Survey of 154 scholars places 45th president behind even ‘historically calamitous chief executives’ linked to civil war

Donald Trump finished 45th and rock bottom of a list ranking US presidents by greatness, trailing even “historically calamitous chief executives” who failed to stop the civil war or botched its aftermath.

Worse for the likely Republican nominee this year, his probable opponent, Joe Biden, debuted at No 14.

“Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall,” Justin Vaughn and Brandon Rottinghaus, the political scientists behind the survey, wrote in the Los Angeles Times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Reagan can be next to last. He's done more damage to modern America than all others but Trump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    He was tough on the USSR, at least. Obama and Biden not arming Ukraine enough before the conflicts caused Russia to be more successful than it has any right to be

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why is it Obama or Biden's responsibility to arm a foreign country?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because for once, America is helping against an imperialist aggressor rather than encouraging it. It also happens to be in our best interest to show to other dictators how bad an idea it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fight your own battles instead of proxy wars?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    OK. Now we get directly involved and Russia goes nuclear, or we don't get involved at all and Russia takes over Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    so it's ok if Ukrainians die in the process. as long as it's not americans right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You offering something better? Because I'm not seeing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    FIght your own fight. This war by proxy shit is bunk. If he's bad enough to stop, then let's go fucking stop him. If he's not then why waste our money and their lives? It could be over tomorrow if we really wanted it to be, but we'll just string it along, drag it out. Fuel the war machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because they'd go nuclear. We covered this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    you don't know that. and by being the first country to "go nuclear" they'd be putting a HUGE target on their backs. no way that would happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ok, it makes things more likely to go nuclear. Now that's that settled, this is a bad idea, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Prove you're not a sealion first.

    Or how about this: I would love to see NATO go gloves off. We tell Poland "Hulk? Smash." and they rush across the border and reinforce Ukrainian positions. A US carrier group rolls up and sinks what remains of the Black Sea Fleet before the Admiral can get a second cup of coffee. Marines start landing in Sevastopol and the obligatory McDonalds is setup within 36 hours. F-22s body the Russian air force without even being seen. The Kerch Strait Bridge isn't just bombed, but completely taken out from end to end. What remains of Russian ground positions west of Mariupol is full of soldiers who hear rumors that NATO POW camps will give you hot food and a warm blanket, and that's sounding like a damn good deal by the end of the week.

    Do you know why I don't advocate for that? Because I'm not a goddam fucking moron who thinks Putin would just accept this loss and run away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    Isn't that what I said? FIGHT YOUR OWN BATTLES??? Putin would HAVE to accept losses like this because as it is he's having a hard time keeping people IN the russian military. Losses on this scale would seal it. While we're at it just go assassinate him. Why not? leave him alive and this shit continues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Because the US disarmed Ukraine in exchange for security promises. Time to actually live up to your promises

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Russia guaranteed Ukraine security for disarmament, the UK and US made assurances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Well, it's still shitty since everyone bullied Ukraine to disarm and then Russia invaded and the arm shipments are not enough to stop Russia from continuing to take land

    Iran and North Korea are better allies than the US and that sucks for global diplomacy

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    oh so why don't we ACTUALLY DEFEND instead of just sending fuck tons of money are arms? like i said, this shit could be over tomorrow if anyone really wanted it to be. to many people are making too much money off of it. war is good for business incase you haven't noticed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments