you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Better than yours. The wordiness don't make it true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think you're confused, I'm not the one complaining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [+] -12 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I don't think a lot of Lemmy understands it doesn't matter how you are subsidizing the wages, you're doing it regardless. Like this clown who thinks food will be cheaper if more cash goes through the owner to the waiter instead of straight to the waiter. Regardless of system the customer is paying for everything, not the owner, unless of course his business is failing. Imagine the entitlement required to desire everyone change their model to make things cheaper for you, at a business that is completely a luxury. You could simply learn to cook instead of whining about tipping.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments