Not open to the public. Open to those who actually contribute to it's operations.

And in none of your objections can you justify the CEO pay and the political power they weild. 40x the lowest paid worker, and no more.

And also, btw: abolish corporations.

Do you think shareholders want their money going to extravagent buildings, Italian desks, and billions in hoarded cash?

Your view of "shareholders" is that they are just cash cows to be milked and not financial participants. As a shareholder I gained fourteen cents this year; how much did the CEO gain?

Only open to the Workers, not the public, and it's a Worker Co-operative. An existing Socialist organizational structure, not new.

Fcking lol

It is entirely relevant. By asking what a worker would do if they don't want to contribute to actively managing a company, you are demonstrating a lack of understanding how Capitalist systems function. You're implying Capitalist owners actively contribute and manage the companies they own. Owning stocks and thus a portion of companies doesn't mean you're an active manager, it just entitles you to voting power proportional to your ownership.

If workers owned the Means of Production, then they collectively have voting power, but a worker that does not wish to use said voting power would act just as any other Capitalist that does not wish to exert their power would do: Collect profit and maintain their current power.