137
Analysis | Printer ink is a scam. Here’s how to spend less. (wapo.st)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Washington Post: Americans waste $10 billion each year on name-brand ink. So we tested low-cost options including remanufactured cartridges, ink injection kits — and even making our own.

My advice: get a mono laser printer. Printing is handy but relatively infrequent for a lot of people these days. If that's your use case, mono laser is the way to go. Toner does not dry out or go bad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago

Glad someone made this point. My next printer will definitely be a tank printer. It's basically flipping the business proposal back to "pay for the printer up front" instead of "pay for the printer whenever you buy ink". My current printer was cheap enough that I basically spend enough on ink to buy a new printer every few years, given degradation of cartridges when they're left after opening.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent