▲ 1021 ▼ Is threads bad? Yes. But Elon being knocked down a peg or two is worth it. (lemmy.ml) submitted 3 years ago by ken27238@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] graphite@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) The usage of the analogy by definition implies a comparison of some kind. Otherwise, wny use it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) To exaggerate and make a point? To rile people up and ruffle some feathers? The comparison isn't between the two of them and the two Nazis, the comparison is between the two of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] graphite@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) No no no, those are valid, sure, but they wouldn't be possible without that initial comparison. The comparison isn't between the two of them and the two Nazis, the comparison is between the two of them. There's the implication that they're both "evil" or "bad figures", which is the entire point. The analogy itself wouldn't be that great otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah, the implication is that their bad or evil, but I don't really see it as comparing them to the Nazis. They just exaggerated for effect and used the most extreme example of "evil" they could think of to make a point. At least that how it seemed to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) To exaggerate and make a point? To rile people up and ruffle some feathers? The comparison isn't between the two of them and the two Nazis, the comparison is between the two of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] graphite@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) No no no, those are valid, sure, but they wouldn't be possible without that initial comparison. The comparison isn't between the two of them and the two Nazis, the comparison is between the two of them. There's the implication that they're both "evil" or "bad figures", which is the entire point. The analogy itself wouldn't be that great otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah, the implication is that their bad or evil, but I don't really see it as comparing them to the Nazis. They just exaggerated for effect and used the most extreme example of "evil" they could think of to make a point. At least that how it seemed to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] graphite@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) No no no, those are valid, sure, but they wouldn't be possible without that initial comparison. The comparison isn't between the two of them and the two Nazis, the comparison is between the two of them. There's the implication that they're both "evil" or "bad figures", which is the entire point. The analogy itself wouldn't be that great otherwise permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah, the implication is that their bad or evil, but I don't really see it as comparing them to the Nazis. They just exaggerated for effect and used the most extreme example of "evil" they could think of to make a point. At least that how it seemed to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago* Yeah, the implication is that their bad or evil, but I don't really see it as comparing them to the Nazis. They just exaggerated for effect and used the most extreme example of "evil" they could think of to make a point. At least that how it seemed to me. permalink fedilink source parent