you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The point of the dishonest article is to make you believe the CEO feels entitled to gamers becoming OK with subscription models. What he actually feels is a hope that subscription models will take off. It's rage-bait. Did it work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    ...you believe the CEO feels entitled to gamers becoming OK with subscription models. What he actually feels is a hope that subscription models will take off

    That sounds like a distinction without a difference to me.

  • source
  • parent