you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 63 points 2 years ago (26 children)

All the talk about Biden being mentally unifit coming out of the Trump camp has to be pure projection. Trump is what, only 4 years younger? He's had some gaffes just as bad imo

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (23 children)

    They're both mentally unfit IMHO. One is a bit demented, the other is lucky that his dementia happens to help cover a pile of seething shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    Biden isn't a good person by any means but we're literally comparing the next Hitler to Bill Clinton.

    Clinton got a blowjob and got impeached. Trump fucked a hooker and no one gave a single fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Bill Clinton is only 77, WTF why is our current president 81 when the former president 30 years ago is currently younger???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago*

    Clinton (and Obama, for that matter) were exceptionally young presidents.

    Clinton was the youngest president at the time of his induction since Kennedy (Kennedy was also the youngest President at the end of his term for other reasons, namely because it was the youngest a President had ever died, if that makes sense). JFK was the youngest since TR, who was the youngest ever, and Obama was only a year or so younger than Clinton at the time of induction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    the next Hitler to Bill Clinton

    The next Hitler to Hindenburg, more like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Biden is a Genocidal piece of shit but calling him Hitler goes a bit far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (11 children)

    really? genocidal?

    bibi is genocidal. biden is enabling. your hyperbole is showing.

    But you know what, enjoy trump then, I'm sure that'll go much better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (10 children)

    No giving Zyklon B to the Nazis while they are putting the Jews in gas chambers is not committing genocide, it's enabling genocide!

    No Bibi isn't committing genocide, he's just ordering it. He's not actually shooting Arabs!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Enjoy Genocide. As long it's not you it's fine right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (7 children)

    for just a moment, think, you stupid ass: who's more open to a two state solution and life in Palestine - biden or trump?

    goooo ahead, elect trump and watch palestine literally disappear under bibi/trump.

    USE YOUR FUCKING BRAIN, they're people you dolt not point in a silly game, and you're gimbling with their lives. Trump won't give two shits about their genocide. He'll probably raise more support for bibi.

    damn do I have to spell every single thing out to you? with crayons?

    trump's not gonna help anyone but himself. meanwhile biden insists on a two state solution.

    https://www.npr.org/2024/01/18/1225309529/the-biden-administration-insists-a-2-state-solution-remains-a-real-possibility

    there it's spelled out with crayon, and yet you'll still ignore reality. gonna block you now, moron

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (6 children)

    Trump is involved in the least conflicts out of our presidents in the last 2 decades. I'm not voting for the guy either, but Trump isn't exactly beholden to Israel like establishment Dems (Biden) are. I'm not saying Trump will save Gaza, but his record during his last term points to less enabling than even a democratic president would.

    Food for thought, I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    trump couldn't find gaza on a map. don't tell me he's enlightened, his foreign policy was manifest racism.

    ignorance isn't aid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I'm just saying there isn't a lot of credence to the "Trump will be even worse for Gaza", pretending like there is is just scare tactics. Biden literally is aiding a genocide right now, that means a lot more than "Trump might".

    Again, I'm not a Trump voter, I just think we should be fair here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes? Is being a Biden critic equal to being a Trump voter? Those things are not the same, but okay. Trump is a bigoted turd, we all know this.

    Here's some facts, Biden is supporting a religious ethnostate carrying out at the least a mass displacement and slaughter of a people, and at the most, aiding and abetting a genocide.

    Trump is the first US president since Carter to not lead us into a new war or escalate a current conflict. That's a fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Mouthing off? Literally my only point was that Trump isn't as much of a war hawk as other presidents, Democrats included, so the argument about him being worse for Palestinians isn't very sound, that's it.

    Relax, my dude, we're probably more aligned politically than you're allowing yourself to believe right now and I understand that. This issue hits close to home for me, and I find support for the Palestinian occupation to be pretty bipartisan, unfortunately. Just trying to draw attention to that, it's not so much that Trump is this paragon of peace, it's that Biden isn't, and that sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Okay, but we have to pick the lesser evil senile candidate. We only have two choices. And even if a third party guy were to run, a vote for that guy would actually be a vote for one of the other two guys.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    For sure. But the problem is systemic. Having to "vote for the lesser evil" is symptom of a "winner takes all"-election/governance.

    Throw in private interests in of the primaries candidate selection, add extensive private ownership of media coverage, and you complete the pretence of "by the people".

    Either the US does a redo of the election process, or we'll see if the next fascist coup attempt sticks or not. I suppose learning from history and Hitler's initial failed coup, is a bit too on the nose. But, then again, had it happened in the US today, he wouldn't have been put in jail for treason, and then might not have written Mein Kampf, and perhaps then also not manage to succeed in the second coup?

    It's not like we're repeating this storyline play by play. Hitler didn't use the term "fake news" in an effort to undermine the function of the press and critical reporting... Because he spoke German, and they called it "große Lüge" instead.

    Oh well... shrug

  • source
  • parent