you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

He is maybe somewhat more radical than a succdem at best. I just think it's pretty funny when he's right, or at least when he winds up looking good in hindsight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Didnt't he get really mad about his writers trying to unionize a few years back or am I confusing him with someone else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    That's him. Libertarian socialist who got mad at the writers for his magazine trying organize because he believes the magazine needs an editorial line guided by his vision.

    Being a magazine editor is the anarchist to Blanquist "I will make Stalin look like an anarchist" pipeline.

  • source
  • parent