558
Anything else? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

This is a good take* and I agree 100%. It's more complex than it seems at first, as you detail.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    There are no good ticks

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I have to respectfully disagree with you there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Ok so I haven't seen that show in over 20 years, so I'm going off of hazy memories here, but as much as I like the guy, I don't think he was aligned good. He's kinda stupid, and would get talked into doing some pretty heinous shit when Arthur wasn't there to act as his voice of reason. I'd say he's either True Neutral, or Chaotic Neutral. Arthur is Lawful Good

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don’t think being dumb or gullible precludes you from being good. His heart is in the right place. In a fictional world of super heroes and villains, I’m unsure if he’s operating within vigilante laws. I think he’s dumb enough to not know what they are and attempt to follow them. If he was willfully ignorant of the law it’d push him toward chaotic. So I’d say he’s definitely neutral.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •