this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
502 points (97.2% liked)

Hacker News

4122 readers
2 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

These are pretty terrible arguments.

  1. Google is a primarily advertising based company yes, but Apple and Microsoft aren't
  2. You can't compare chromium to IE - chromium is open source, and also it's actually good
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The issue is the rendering engine monopoly. Apple and Microsoft browsers as well as chromium all use chrome rendering engine making them basically the same browser under the hood.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

That's not true - Apple's browsers use WebKit. I wish they used chromium though, Safari is basically the new IE.

Having all browsers use the same, open source, modern and powerful rendering engine has many benefits. It makes web development MUCH easier, improves user experience because websites work the same on all browsers (apart from any proprietary stuff the browser vendors might add on top of chromium, but that's not chromium's fault), and greatly speeds up adoption of new web standards.

I don't want there to be a Chrome browser monopoly for obvious reasons but I don't see the downside of every browser using the same rendering engine as long as it's not controlled by any one entity

load more comments (1 replies)