you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (8 children)

I feel like there are minimum two definitions of cult, that being a high controll group like say jones town and to a lesser but still damaging extent seventh day adventists for example and just a smaller religious grouping.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (7 children)

    This place would 100% meet the BITE standard of cult classification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    The BITE classification was invented in order to justify hatred of small religions, by taking a word that already had a meaning (cult) and attaching a second, pejorative meaning to it. It's like if I write a fantasy novel with a species of evil creatures called jews. Jew is already a word, and it's a horrific act of religious persecution to take a pre-existing word for marginalised religions and spin it into an unrelated negative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Yes, because controlling a group's behavior, information access, thoughts, and emotions is completely acceptable. Autonomy be damned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I didn't justify the abusive behaviours described by the BITE model. In fact I was very clear that I disliked those behaviours, and their association with an important religious term. You should work on your reading comprehension so you can stop seeing enemies everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    I apologize for misunderstanding. Can you provide a source or reasoning why you think the BITE classification itself was intended to make "cult" a bad word?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments