You're very confident, at least. I'll give you that.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24118193/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6793471/

"We hypothesize that THC neurotoxicity is attributable to activation of the prostanoid synthesis pathway and generation of free radicals by cyclooxygenase.", would make THC, by definition, a carcinogen.

I also agree with your last statement completely. My issue is that everyone touts weed like it's God's greatest gift to mankind, and it very clearly is not. Stoners are easily identifiable by their inability to think clearly and quickly even when sober for stints. Weed absolutely affects the brain.

But shouting it's safety from the heavens is not at all responsible, simply because not enough research has gone into the substance. Even CBD is a neurotoxin, albeit with some observed neuro-protective properties: https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/how-the-brain-protects-itself-from-the-negative-effects-of-cbd/#:~:text=However%2C%20when%20CBD%20was%20applied,50%25%20of%20the%20neurons%20died.

If those neuro-protective properties failed in other parts of the brain for reasons of age, mice brains being significantly different, medications, or health conditions, the results would be devastating.

Not the perspective I was arguing. I was arguing that people should be allowed to make informed decisions about what they want to put in their body and that criminalizing drug use doesn't help anyone but criminal drug gangs.