▲ 265 ▼ Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney was asked by Verge why there is no support for the Steam Deck for Fortnite (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml [S] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) Full verge article permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pipariturbiini@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not related to Steam Deck, but this caught my eye: As soon as we thwarted their effort, they went around to 27 different developers and offered each one a payoff to undermine any effort we had to get their games onto our store exclusively. Activision and Riot and Supercell had direct distribution plans that they were planning on; Google paid them not to pursue those plans. Just direct blatant violations of anti-competition law, it’s crazy a company of Google’s scale would do that. So Tim is stating that Google making exclusivity deals with applications developers is breaching laws and should be stopped, but Epic having exclusivity deals on their own stores is okay and not anti-competitive. Hypocrite much, eh? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jaharkes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago I believe what wormtongue was saying here was that Google was paying developers to abandon their plans to release exclusively for the Epic store. It doesn't mention forcing anyone to drop Epic, or other platforms. Not sure what is anti-competitive aside from forcing the Epic store to compete on their merits (price/platform support) instead of their exclusive game deals. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pipariturbiini@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not related to Steam Deck, but this caught my eye: As soon as we thwarted their effort, they went around to 27 different developers and offered each one a payoff to undermine any effort we had to get their games onto our store exclusively. Activision and Riot and Supercell had direct distribution plans that they were planning on; Google paid them not to pursue those plans. Just direct blatant violations of anti-competition law, it’s crazy a company of Google’s scale would do that. So Tim is stating that Google making exclusivity deals with applications developers is breaching laws and should be stopped, but Epic having exclusivity deals on their own stores is okay and not anti-competitive. Hypocrite much, eh? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jaharkes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago I believe what wormtongue was saying here was that Google was paying developers to abandon their plans to release exclusively for the Epic store. It doesn't mention forcing anyone to drop Epic, or other platforms. Not sure what is anti-competitive aside from forcing the Epic store to compete on their merits (price/platform support) instead of their exclusive game deals. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jaharkes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago I believe what wormtongue was saying here was that Google was paying developers to abandon their plans to release exclusively for the Epic store. It doesn't mention forcing anyone to drop Epic, or other platforms. Not sure what is anti-competitive aside from forcing the Epic store to compete on their merits (price/platform support) instead of their exclusive game deals. permalink fedilink source parent