you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 years ago (13 children)

I would pick base 12. Which would you prefer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    base 60 Babylonian gang where you at

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    Base 60 has too many symbols for the digits

    Base 12 you only need two more symbols to follow 9

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah but it doesn't have the same schwag as base 60

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean base 60 would be cool and all, but it would be unwieldy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Granted, but it divides by two multiple times. Take a good, round number like 1024 and you can halve it 10 times in a row.

    The metric system handles thirds by just using multiples. Like, you buy a 1200 wide benchtop and then you can fit a three 400 drawers under it.

    You could technically do the same in hex and the base numbers are all (x^y + x^(y+1)) which represent well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment