1258
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 71 points 2 years ago

I don’t get it… is that store supposed to let people in to sleep on their beds?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

It's a critique on capitalism, where we have the technology and products to improve our quality of life but restrict access to them for a considerable percentage of humas. You're welcome.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

Even in a utopian communist society there would be showrooms for products, to help people select what best meets their sleep/medical needs. Those beds would be unused too.

It is a separate issue, that the showroom is not responsible for, that resulted in a homeless person not having a bed.

Systemic issues have systemic solutions. If you try to apply a local solution to a systemic problem, you just kicked the can. (As in, letting homeless people use the showroom beds).

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

No. In utopian society there wouldn't be the person who doesn't have a bed.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Ok? That's not contested in my comment.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

But there is the assumption that bed showrooms need to be filled with inventory so that people can decide what bed they want to buy while others don't even have a bed.

I'm not communist because I think skill and effort should be rewarded. But I guess you could say I'm basic need communist in that I think society should do their best to ensure everyone has their basic needs met and rewards those supplying those basic needs beyond their own basic needs.

Luxury options and upgrades should be waiting until after everyone has the base version. And that base version should be efficiently and effectively designed, not designed deliberately to make the user want to upgrade.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

The idea is that a socialist/communist utopia wouldn't concern itself with the pursuit and hoarding of capital. So the "showroom" wouldn't really be a concept. We'd have catalogues and stores, but the fancy aspirational dressing that comes with the wastes of space known as furniture stores would be less prevalent.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Then you missed the point.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

There's always going to be people who fall through the cracks in your safety net because they for some (usually mental health related) reason just can't integrate into the framework of society. You can offer help, but even without conditions attached there's going to be people who will refuse it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't think the issue in America is that we've tried the best we can but some have slipped through the cracks. More along the lines of we've tried nothing and we are all out of ideas.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
1258 points (87.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

13001 readers
632 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS