you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's not the kind of attack. It's the fact that they did it at all. Maybe they're trying to draw attention back to Ukraine and cause a reaction from Russia that "justifies" further aid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not defending Ukraine, far from it, but Russia is importing military supplies from China, mostly across a relatively small number of rail lines. Interrupting that flow of goods is for them, a worthwhile endeavour even without any propaganda outcome, the same as disabling railways between Ukraine and Poland would be for Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I don't disagree. In a hypothetical long list of targets for Ukraine to strike, this is probably one of the "best" ones since it's clearly a valid military target against a nation currently invading them (agree or disagree on justification, it's an event that is happening).

    It just also feels like a possible escalation when (naively, apparently) I thought, or last I saw, Ukraine and Russia were starting on some sort of peace agreement. Admittedly, I haven't read up much on Ukraine in a couple months. I hope they are still working on an agreement and this doesn't ruin anything.

  • source
  • parent