you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Signatures don't need to be notarized to be legally binding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    No they don't. You don't know what you are talking about. Plenty of non-notorized contacts, including verbal only agreements, have been enforced by the courts.

    Just a few sources among a thousand or so:

    https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/small-business/do-contracts-need-to-be-notarized-or-witnessed/

    https://www.upcounsel.com/does-a-contract-have-to-be-notarized-to-be-legal#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20there%20is%20no,attest%20to%20the%20person's%20signature.

  • source
  • parent