Yes but his message was 'feed hungry children' not exactly a complex political or economic argument like the OP mentioned.

There's definitely positive examples yes. But by golly are they rare and mostly something we can only judge on the surface. Geniunely appreciate Rashys work a lot but I'm saddened he even has to do that level of advocating for such a no brainer

I agree, but I also think their is an astronomical difference between "Saying something" and "Doing something".

Rashford has also stopped doing most of that since he changed his PR agency.

I generally agree with you but just playing devil's advocate, I think Rashford used his voice and position well to make good effective change.

I mean... until pretty recently we'd have said the same about Jordan Henderson....

I don’t even mean it as banter, but Marcus Rashford excels at Philanthropy as much as he does Football. No devil’s advocate about it.

I’d listen to Peter Cech’s opinion on hockey and drumming. You can be knowledgeable in more than one field.

That just means you agree with him this time. Doesn’t change the basic principle

There’s a difference between philanthropic work and speaking about topics you shouldn’t. Rashford was philanthropic work while Brad Pitt on climate change is just nonsense.

Rashford is different because he put his money where his mouth is and helped a lot of people in the process. What the fuck did Henderson ever actually do for the LGBTQ+ community?