you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (7 children)

Because 95% of the people that worked for him demanded it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The fact that the employees were able represent their defacto power in a crisis is good, but the fact that the don't have explicit power in the decision making process is why this able to happen in the first place.

    There are no good kings, even if the best men were made kings, they would be inherently tainted by the position.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The fact that the employees were able represent their defacto power in a crisis is good

    That's all that I'm saying.

    If you've got issues with the whole concept of hierarchical power structures or there being such a thing as "leaders", that's a bit beyond the scope of this particular situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment