251
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
251 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13862 readers
762 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
It's a cope. The necessary violence is really hard psychologically, people loop around to becoming hyperviolent as a way to deal with it.
It is and it isn't. Do you think the Bolsheviks were wrong to kill children?
I think it's sad that children died, but do you understand that children are going to die in every revolution? So some people, in order to cope with this, loop around to "fuck them kids, kill em all, unlimited genocide" etc etc
Oh I thought you meant people sarcastically say hyper violent things to cope. I agree.
Actually, I think it's both. It's sarcastic and also serious.
I think the royal family got owned and it was funny
I don't really think it's funny. Sure, the adults are funny, fuck them.
Alexei was hemophilic they didnt need to shoot him, they probably couldve just gave him a papercut and he wouldve died of exanguination
Seems more cruel.
Blame the white army, they would have rallied among the eoyal family and propped them up as leaders because monarchists are fucking dumb, making a 6 year old your ruler lmao
If they wouldnt have been monarchists the kids couldve probably been let go
I do.
White army more lior cringe army ownrd
I think it was a justified, necessary evil, but celebrating the death of any innocent life is pretty weird to me idk. like i'll gladly celebrate the greater picture of what it brought an end to but the killing of a kid in it of itself?
Only reason the kids died is because the Tsar was using them as human shields.
Yeah that makes sense. I've seen some people support Hiroshima here in the past and that wan't even necessary violence