▲ 76 ▼ Commentary: We face a world potentially running out of antibiotics (www.channelnewsasia.com) submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@beehaw.org 77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago (2 children) Please don't tell me you're gonna bring up the stupid soy fields in the rain forest argument :'D permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) being vegan doesn't stop soy from being grown in rainforests permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) 85% of global soy is pressed for oil. the vast majority of the soy that's fed to animals is the industrial waste from that process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) environmental destruction continues whether you are vegan or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago also what part of my comment prompted you to post that random response? permalink fedilink source parent [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) yep due to the meat industry keeping going regardless of a fairly small demographic quitting their products permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) so maybe you should stop lying to people about being vegan helping the planet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It does, if enough people did it. You're so angry lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It does, if enough people did it. do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues? Less meat produced = better. How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) being vegan doesn't stop soy from being grown in rainforests permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) 85% of global soy is pressed for oil. the vast majority of the soy that's fed to animals is the industrial waste from that process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) 85% of global soy is pressed for oil. the vast majority of the soy that's fed to animals is the industrial waste from that process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) 85% of global soy is pressed for oil. the vast majority of the soy that's fed to animals is the industrial waste from that process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) environmental destruction continues whether you are vegan or not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago also what part of my comment prompted you to post that random response? permalink fedilink source parent [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) yep due to the meat industry keeping going regardless of a fairly small demographic quitting their products permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) so maybe you should stop lying to people about being vegan helping the planet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It does, if enough people did it. You're so angry lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It does, if enough people did it. do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues? Less meat produced = better. How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago also what part of my comment prompted you to post that random response? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) yep due to the meat industry keeping going regardless of a fairly small demographic quitting their products permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) so maybe you should stop lying to people about being vegan helping the planet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It does, if enough people did it. You're so angry lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It does, if enough people did it. do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues? Less meat produced = better. How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) so maybe you should stop lying to people about being vegan helping the planet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It does, if enough people did it. You're so angry lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It does, if enough people did it. do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues? Less meat produced = better. How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) It does, if enough people did it. You're so angry lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It does, if enough people did it. do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues? Less meat produced = better. How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) youre lying everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) everything i've said is true It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) i have math on my side, but also the USDA says so as well. Although some of the crop is used directly, more than 80 percent of the crop is processed into soybean meal and oil through crushing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data. i've provided exactly as much data as you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago Check again bro https://feddit.de/comment/4912410 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It does, if enough people did it. do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues? Less meat produced = better. How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues? Less meat produced = better. How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Less meat produced = better. that hasn't happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew? you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled. permalink fedilink source parent