▲ 76 ▼ Commentary: We face a world potentially running out of antibiotics (www.channelnewsasia.com) submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@beehaw.org 77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) 85% of global soy is pressed for oil. the vast majority of the soy that's fed to animals is the industrial waste from that process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) 85% of global soy is pressed for oil. the vast majority of the soy that's fed to animals is the industrial waste from that process. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wheree do you get your numbers from? https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/ They seem off my guy. Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png i can't click your paywalled link here's what the UN's FAO says oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser. Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote. Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Try a different browser. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDUjeR01wnU permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water. that has never happened. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. Thats the problem. Global consumption and production are increasing Do. You. Follow? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it. Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore. Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term. that's true. what you said before was not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down. that's not causal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. i never said that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny how that works isn't it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I wholeheartedly agree. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You're hilarious. Nice try. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago this is deflection permalink fedilink source parent