▲ 1219 ▼ True Story (discuss.tchncs.de) submitted 2 years ago by dramaticcat@discuss.tchncs.de to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 251 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (1 child) And yet men go for the women with long eyelashes. Just because men aren't aware of it doesn't mean the women's moves don't work. But even if they didn't, imagine this: Women can change the way they look entirely without wanting to look hotter for men. Shocking, I know. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Gabu@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's people out there attracted to literal human excrement, so you think that's also a reasonable thing to wear on your face? Just because some idiots are attracted to that stuff doesn't make it inherently attractive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't believe I made any comment about what's "inherently attractive" or "reasonable" to "wear on your face". What's with the loaded question? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Gabu@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) yet men go for the women with long eyelashes Implication of status and reasonability. Just because men aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean the women’s moves don’t work. Supposition of validity and established status. Women can change the way they look Implication of fashion, which includes makeup, which is worn on face. If you're going to blatantly lie, do it in a setting where you won't get called out for being a filthy liar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) If I say "the sun rises in the morning", is that also an "implication of status and reasonability"? Do explain how a neutral statement implies "status and reasonability". Go ahead! Also explain what an "implication of fashion" is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I'd be surprised if that's news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion. You also failed to show how I said anything about something being "inherently attractive". Try to keep up with your own accusations, please. If you're going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There's people out there attracted to literal human excrement, so you think that's also a reasonable thing to wear on your face? Just because some idiots are attracted to that stuff doesn't make it inherently attractive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't believe I made any comment about what's "inherently attractive" or "reasonable" to "wear on your face". What's with the loaded question? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Gabu@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) yet men go for the women with long eyelashes Implication of status and reasonability. Just because men aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean the women’s moves don’t work. Supposition of validity and established status. Women can change the way they look Implication of fashion, which includes makeup, which is worn on face. If you're going to blatantly lie, do it in a setting where you won't get called out for being a filthy liar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) If I say "the sun rises in the morning", is that also an "implication of status and reasonability"? Do explain how a neutral statement implies "status and reasonability". Go ahead! Also explain what an "implication of fashion" is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I'd be surprised if that's news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion. You also failed to show how I said anything about something being "inherently attractive". Try to keep up with your own accusations, please. If you're going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't believe I made any comment about what's "inherently attractive" or "reasonable" to "wear on your face". What's with the loaded question? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Gabu@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) yet men go for the women with long eyelashes Implication of status and reasonability. Just because men aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean the women’s moves don’t work. Supposition of validity and established status. Women can change the way they look Implication of fashion, which includes makeup, which is worn on face. If you're going to blatantly lie, do it in a setting where you won't get called out for being a filthy liar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) If I say "the sun rises in the morning", is that also an "implication of status and reasonability"? Do explain how a neutral statement implies "status and reasonability". Go ahead! Also explain what an "implication of fashion" is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I'd be surprised if that's news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion. You also failed to show how I said anything about something being "inherently attractive". Try to keep up with your own accusations, please. If you're going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Gabu@lemmy.world -6 points 2 years ago (1 child) yet men go for the women with long eyelashes Implication of status and reasonability. Just because men aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean the women’s moves don’t work. Supposition of validity and established status. Women can change the way they look Implication of fashion, which includes makeup, which is worn on face. If you're going to blatantly lie, do it in a setting where you won't get called out for being a filthy liar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) If I say "the sun rises in the morning", is that also an "implication of status and reasonability"? Do explain how a neutral statement implies "status and reasonability". Go ahead! Also explain what an "implication of fashion" is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I'd be surprised if that's news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion. You also failed to show how I said anything about something being "inherently attractive". Try to keep up with your own accusations, please. If you're going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) If I say "the sun rises in the morning", is that also an "implication of status and reasonability"? Do explain how a neutral statement implies "status and reasonability". Go ahead! Also explain what an "implication of fashion" is, in detail, please. Women are, in fact, able to change the way they look, I'd be surprised if that's news to you. This fact is entirely unrelated to fashion. You also failed to show how I said anything about something being "inherently attractive". Try to keep up with your own accusations, please. If you're going to postulate your twisted interpretation means another person lied, do it in a way that at least pretends to refer to what has been said. permalink fedilink source parent
