Sandra Newman @sannewman

THE SEVEN SECRETS OF HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE

  1. Private school
  2. Legacy lvy admission
  3. Nepotism hire
  4. Seed capital from family
  5. Club memberships
  6. Personal assistant, nanny, ghost writer answer
  7. Journalists who ask, "What's your secret?" and uncritically publish the
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -21 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I came from dirt poor and I'm wealthy now. In my opinion the key to success comes down to a few things.

  1. Education
  2. Need
  3. Luck

Education: My mother made $15k per year and my private school tuition was $375/month. This also provided me with friends that were not dirt poor (this also helps a lot). My wife received the best education the Soviet Union had to offer, which is better than anything we could even imagine stateside.

Need: Hunger is s great motivator. It also gives you this every present fear that if you take your foot off the gas, you'll be hungry again.

Luck: This one is obvious. Plenty of people are hungry and plenty of people have good educations and still struggle.

I think my wife and I did well because we teamed up early. Had we tried solo I think we would have failed.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    You seem to have neglected the most important one: privilege.

    Millions of Americans are stuck in a cycle of generational poverty. Really difficult to manage even the first one when you're grinding to just put food on the table daily, and that's the reality for 46 million Americans right now.

    This ultra-priviliged, ignorant "you just gotta grind for it" attitude is literally what this meme is making fun of. Congrats on being the butt of the joke and doubling down on it.

    Somehow I highly doubt your mom spent 1/3 of her pre-tax income to send you to private school. And based on how much she paid for it, I assume you went to private school in the 80s. The median family wage these days can't afford rent, much less $15-20,000 a year private schools, which by the way is what they cost this century. And if my assumption is correct about you growing up in the 80s, that $15,000 a year is the equivalent of nearly $59,000 a year today - higher than the median family wage, so not quite dirt poor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Bro you just gatekept how poor someone who grew up hungry must have been for their parent to send them to a private school, probably to escape that generational cycle you were harping on.

    You literally just went and did the Fox News Lobster Dinner on Foodstamps special.

    I get that it's frustrating to hear "lol just grind bro" attitude but Jesus fuck did you pick the exact wrong string of words to put together given the context of what they said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, good for you, and you're not entirely wrong, but you've got them in the wrong order. Luck is number 1, because the rest flow from that (education, connections, etc)

    People place WAY too much of their own effort (which is important), and not enough on luck.

    As long as you're very cognisant that for many, many people, the cycle of poverty is unbreakable to not fault of their own.

    If yes, then, I'm happy for you and you should still feel proud of yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    For sure, they weren't in order. Where you're born is all luck. The fact that I was born to a mother willing to sacrifice a large percentage of her income towards education is also luck. Etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Education is number one? The daughter of my wife's housemate has a PhD and she's been out of work for two years. That also sounds like need.

    Guess she's just lacking your luck. Maybe that part is more important than you think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    You shouldn't do a PhD for money, that's the first thing my supervisor told me when I started mine. Also, having a doctorate might disqualify you for a big portion of the market, and in many cases it can be a disadvantage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh, no doubt. I'm just saying that the bare minimum you need to "lift yourself up" is education, hunger/drive, and luck. Believe me, I know many privileged little shits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    Yeah even nepo babies have to compete with other nepo babies especially in the upper echelon of their field. They still need to have drive and excel at whatever they are doing. Just look at Formula 1, the sport that is full of rich kids, the driver with the richest dad who even bought a team for his son has never won an F1 race in his life and only has 3 podiums so far while his team mate had several this year alone. And the two drivers with the most world championships wins are from middle class families. While privilege will get them far it won’t carry them to the top.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    1. Education

    I really hope my student loan debt gets the memo that it was supposed to make me wealthy.

    Education was the best decision I've ever made for myself (because there's so much more value to education than just a career/future paycheck), but I went into it knowing that the trade off would be decades of financial sacrifice and probably hardship. The hope is that it would get me a middle to upper middle class salary, but I'm not sure anyone anticipates higher education to be even one of many keys to real financial success.

    I think my wife and I did well because we teamed up early. Had we tried solo I think we would have failed.

    It really sucks that marriage is now a financial necessity in the US. Some of us are ace/aro and will never get married or live with a partner. But even for those who aren't, if someone wants to be single or just not move in with their partner, then they should be able to have that choice. I have no idea how I will ever live alone. The thought of living with roommates for the rest of my life turns my stomach. Introverts and neurodivergents should also be able to live in a situation that works for us. One of the worst parts of the housing crisis is compromising what makes a house a home - security, comfort, having your own space. It should be more than just paying to be indoors and having to live in uncomfortable, shady situations just to make that happen.

    Need: Hunger is s great motivator. It also gives you this every present fear that if you take your foot off the gas, you'll be hungry again.

    I hope this is a joke. What a sad way to look at life if not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Education

    Most people misunderstood this. I meant foundational education, not higher education. My wife and I knew that we needed a degree because nobody would hire us with only a highschool diploma. We also could only afford a rural state university because after scholarships and grants it was almost free, and free is basically all we could afford. It was also understood that our degrees would get us absolutely nothing (worthless in almost all sense of the word). Because we had strong foundational education, we were able to absorb and process, and because we knew the degree would be worthless we taught ourselves other skills. So by the time we graduated I already had a fledgling PC and network support business (which led to my first corporate job) and my wife was well on her way towards being able to have enough skill to work on databases including based, SQL Server, and Oracle. None of this is what we wanted as a career but if was something we figured would feed us.

    It really sucks that marriage is now a financial necessity in the US.

    Context is important here. I was an orphan at 16 and wife's parents live in a poor eastern European nation. We literally had no support structure and no safety net. I don't know if it is necessary for everyone, but it was for us.

    I hope this is a joke. What a sad way to look at life if not.

    Not a joke nor do I romanticize it. We shouldn't need to feel like there's a gun to our head or that we are under the master's whip at all times in order to do our best. I'm my case and my life experience, I can't help but love in constant fear that I could be destitute at any moment if I stop trying so hard. I don't know if that's sad or not because that's all I've known since my mother died, but the results are clear. When my friends and colleagues quit or took a break, I didn't. When my friends felt comfortable in their cushy jobs, I quit and took a harder job I was not fully qualified for (I lied my way in) and trusted the fact that I could teach myself how to do it before anyone figured out I couldn't. When my career peaked, I quit and started my own business, then another, then another, etc. I'm not smart. I'm not brave. I'm terrified that at any moment I won't be able to work anymore and I'll have to live off of what I've made so far until the day I die, and I'm not sure it's enough. Trauma is real, and I understand that's what I've got, but the results speak for themselves. Fear and hunger are great motivators.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    People don't want to hear that. They want to keep believing that they're poor not because they made a suboptimal choice but because the system conspired against them. My advice is pretend rich people aren't real and make your life and the people's around you the best you can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    How can we ignore that super-wealthy people exist when there’s a causal link between their situation and ours? They’re rich and most people are poor, and they are rich because others are poor. Wealth doesn’t generate itself, and no human can generate a billion dollars in value alone, even by working 170-hour weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago*

    People getting richer doesn't automatically make someone else poorer. The total amount of resources the human species has access to is constantly growing as our productive power increases. In fact, most of the time the total productive power increase is directly linked to someone getting richer.

    Wealth doesn’t generate itself, and no human can generate a billion dollars in value alone, even by working 170-hour weeks.

    Sure they can. J.K. Rowling is a billionaire. How many people did she exploit by writing 7 books? The people who worked on the trains or in the coffee shops she hung around and bought coffee from? The idea that people only collect wealth by depriving someone else of it is a pre-modern understanding. Same with the idea that value is related to hours worked.

  • source
  • parent