351
In a U.S. First, a Commercial Plant Starts Pulling Carbon From the Air (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Wouldn't it be more efficient to use algae for that and stuff the slime directly in the borehole?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Possible not, you need to maintain the growth conditions for the algae, that has some meaningful energy cost.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    Glass panel over it for greenhouse?

    Can't use more power than carbon skimming.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I actually helped research this as an undergrad. The problem we'd always face is there are certain microorganisms, like rotifers, that can just decimate a tank of algae. Many rotifer species are parthenogenic, so it literally only takes one rotifer to knock out an entire algae tank.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    What if we genetically modified the algae to be impossible to kill and survive in extreme conditions. Like the algae equivalent of kudzu.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •