▲ 652 ▼ They have it ready to go (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world [M] to c/memes@lemmy.world 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) I can only hope. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) Really should happen to be honest, paired with a mandatory education class and requirement of a license. You already need a license to buy other substances such as cigarettes, alcohol, prescription medication, etc. Just give the people what they want FFS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't know why you're getting downvotes. An education class sounds like a good idea. Using psychedelics/dissociatives can be dangerous for first-timers. Better they be educated about the things they might experience on their first trip. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's because illegal substances have a negative connotation of them. It's ironic because they are not only physically safer than legal substances, but they are also both cheaper and have higher recreational value than them. Also, if the masses started doing psychedelics, it would be the downfall of capitalism as everyone begins to realize that the world's governments and corporations are full of shit. Psychedelics really are the metaphorical third eye opener they are touted to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don’t know man I microdosed acid for a while and realized I needed to get a job permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I didn't say anything about not working, though I don't really recommend doing any substances at all if you are not in a decent enough financial situation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) having ambition is not something only capitalism can provide you with. You can you know, do things, in any system permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except have a job. For that you need a capitalist to own the capital and pay you wages for your labor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. One bad thought can ruin the whole trip. I will agree, however, that psychedelics could have value in psychology. Some people need a good ego death. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Theoretically yes, but that's only if you dwell on it the entire time. Removing attention from the thought or changing the immediate environment can help if not negate it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m all for educating people about psychedelics I just don’t want congress building that curriculum permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's fair. Honestly I think perhaps such curriculum is best left in the hands of whichever organization psychiatric doctors are in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I don’t think doctors should be building that curriculum either. I think people with knowledge of psychedelics should be building it. Trip sitters from Burning Man, shamans, deadheads, etc permalink fedilink source parent [–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You need a license to buy cigs and alcohol? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) OI MATE, YOU GOT A LOISENCE FOR THAT CIGGY? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Aye, i got the lie sense to get one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, in so much as you need to prove you're above a certain age. The best way to do that (in the US) is with a driver's license. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lots of states issue IDs from the DMV with equivalent protection features as a driver's license, but isn't a license. Those are good enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not the specific driver's license that matters. The point is that it's still an ID and still a control over who can get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You'd think people would get that point when you say license you just meant "they have to ID you when you buy them" permalink fedilink source parent [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You already need a license to buy other substances such as cigarettes, alcohol, prescription medication, etc. Where? You need an ID but not a license specifically where I'm from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I was referring specifically to the drivers license which is used in place of the standard ID. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sure but the license isn't to purchase those products. There is no licensing for them even though you typically use your license to prove your age. You can also use a passport or military ID or a standard state ID that looks exactly like a license but requires no test. A liquor license is to sell, not purchase. And for the record, I like your ideas but using something like a medical card for purchasing weed would have been a better example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with the medical card as well, but I wouldn't have any issues with it being done recreationally, I just think that if it is done recreationally it should still have a license associated with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Indubitably. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) Really should happen to be honest, paired with a mandatory education class and requirement of a license. You already need a license to buy other substances such as cigarettes, alcohol, prescription medication, etc. Just give the people what they want FFS. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't know why you're getting downvotes. An education class sounds like a good idea. Using psychedelics/dissociatives can be dangerous for first-timers. Better they be educated about the things they might experience on their first trip. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's because illegal substances have a negative connotation of them. It's ironic because they are not only physically safer than legal substances, but they are also both cheaper and have higher recreational value than them. Also, if the masses started doing psychedelics, it would be the downfall of capitalism as everyone begins to realize that the world's governments and corporations are full of shit. Psychedelics really are the metaphorical third eye opener they are touted to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don’t know man I microdosed acid for a while and realized I needed to get a job permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I didn't say anything about not working, though I don't really recommend doing any substances at all if you are not in a decent enough financial situation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) having ambition is not something only capitalism can provide you with. You can you know, do things, in any system permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except have a job. For that you need a capitalist to own the capital and pay you wages for your labor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. One bad thought can ruin the whole trip. I will agree, however, that psychedelics could have value in psychology. Some people need a good ego death. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Theoretically yes, but that's only if you dwell on it the entire time. Removing attention from the thought or changing the immediate environment can help if not negate it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m all for educating people about psychedelics I just don’t want congress building that curriculum permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's fair. Honestly I think perhaps such curriculum is best left in the hands of whichever organization psychiatric doctors are in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I don’t think doctors should be building that curriculum either. I think people with knowledge of psychedelics should be building it. Trip sitters from Burning Man, shamans, deadheads, etc permalink fedilink source parent [–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You need a license to buy cigs and alcohol? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) OI MATE, YOU GOT A LOISENCE FOR THAT CIGGY? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Aye, i got the lie sense to get one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, in so much as you need to prove you're above a certain age. The best way to do that (in the US) is with a driver's license. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lots of states issue IDs from the DMV with equivalent protection features as a driver's license, but isn't a license. Those are good enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not the specific driver's license that matters. The point is that it's still an ID and still a control over who can get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You'd think people would get that point when you say license you just meant "they have to ID you when you buy them" permalink fedilink source parent [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You already need a license to buy other substances such as cigarettes, alcohol, prescription medication, etc. Where? You need an ID but not a license specifically where I'm from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I was referring specifically to the drivers license which is used in place of the standard ID. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sure but the license isn't to purchase those products. There is no licensing for them even though you typically use your license to prove your age. You can also use a passport or military ID or a standard state ID that looks exactly like a license but requires no test. A liquor license is to sell, not purchase. And for the record, I like your ideas but using something like a medical card for purchasing weed would have been a better example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with the medical card as well, but I wouldn't have any issues with it being done recreationally, I just think that if it is done recreationally it should still have a license associated with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Indubitably. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't know why you're getting downvotes. An education class sounds like a good idea. Using psychedelics/dissociatives can be dangerous for first-timers. Better they be educated about the things they might experience on their first trip. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's because illegal substances have a negative connotation of them. It's ironic because they are not only physically safer than legal substances, but they are also both cheaper and have higher recreational value than them. Also, if the masses started doing psychedelics, it would be the downfall of capitalism as everyone begins to realize that the world's governments and corporations are full of shit. Psychedelics really are the metaphorical third eye opener they are touted to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don’t know man I microdosed acid for a while and realized I needed to get a job permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I didn't say anything about not working, though I don't really recommend doing any substances at all if you are not in a decent enough financial situation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) having ambition is not something only capitalism can provide you with. You can you know, do things, in any system permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except have a job. For that you need a capitalist to own the capital and pay you wages for your labor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. One bad thought can ruin the whole trip. I will agree, however, that psychedelics could have value in psychology. Some people need a good ego death. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Theoretically yes, but that's only if you dwell on it the entire time. Removing attention from the thought or changing the immediate environment can help if not negate it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m all for educating people about psychedelics I just don’t want congress building that curriculum permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's fair. Honestly I think perhaps such curriculum is best left in the hands of whichever organization psychiatric doctors are in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I don’t think doctors should be building that curriculum either. I think people with knowledge of psychedelics should be building it. Trip sitters from Burning Man, shamans, deadheads, etc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) It's because illegal substances have a negative connotation of them. It's ironic because they are not only physically safer than legal substances, but they are also both cheaper and have higher recreational value than them. Also, if the masses started doing psychedelics, it would be the downfall of capitalism as everyone begins to realize that the world's governments and corporations are full of shit. Psychedelics really are the metaphorical third eye opener they are touted to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don’t know man I microdosed acid for a while and realized I needed to get a job permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I didn't say anything about not working, though I don't really recommend doing any substances at all if you are not in a decent enough financial situation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) having ambition is not something only capitalism can provide you with. You can you know, do things, in any system permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except have a job. For that you need a capitalist to own the capital and pay you wages for your labor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. One bad thought can ruin the whole trip. I will agree, however, that psychedelics could have value in psychology. Some people need a good ego death. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Theoretically yes, but that's only if you dwell on it the entire time. Removing attention from the thought or changing the immediate environment can help if not negate it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don’t know man I microdosed acid for a while and realized I needed to get a job permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I didn't say anything about not working, though I don't really recommend doing any substances at all if you are not in a decent enough financial situation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) having ambition is not something only capitalism can provide you with. You can you know, do things, in any system permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except have a job. For that you need a capitalist to own the capital and pay you wages for your labor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago I didn't say anything about not working, though I don't really recommend doing any substances at all if you are not in a decent enough financial situation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) having ambition is not something only capitalism can provide you with. You can you know, do things, in any system permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except have a job. For that you need a capitalist to own the capital and pay you wages for your labor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Except have a job. For that you need a capitalist to own the capital and pay you wages for your labor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago no? jobs existed a bit before capitalism even crossed people's minds you know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I dunno. One bad thought can ruin the whole trip. I will agree, however, that psychedelics could have value in psychology. Some people need a good ego death. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Theoretically yes, but that's only if you dwell on it the entire time. Removing attention from the thought or changing the immediate environment can help if not negate it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Theoretically yes, but that's only if you dwell on it the entire time. Removing attention from the thought or changing the immediate environment can help if not negate it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m all for educating people about psychedelics I just don’t want congress building that curriculum permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's fair. Honestly I think perhaps such curriculum is best left in the hands of whichever organization psychiatric doctors are in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I don’t think doctors should be building that curriculum either. I think people with knowledge of psychedelics should be building it. Trip sitters from Burning Man, shamans, deadheads, etc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's fair. Honestly I think perhaps such curriculum is best left in the hands of whichever organization psychiatric doctors are in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I don’t think doctors should be building that curriculum either. I think people with knowledge of psychedelics should be building it. Trip sitters from Burning Man, shamans, deadheads, etc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I don’t think doctors should be building that curriculum either. I think people with knowledge of psychedelics should be building it. Trip sitters from Burning Man, shamans, deadheads, etc permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) You need a license to buy cigs and alcohol? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) OI MATE, YOU GOT A LOISENCE FOR THAT CIGGY? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Aye, i got the lie sense to get one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, in so much as you need to prove you're above a certain age. The best way to do that (in the US) is with a driver's license. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lots of states issue IDs from the DMV with equivalent protection features as a driver's license, but isn't a license. Those are good enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not the specific driver's license that matters. The point is that it's still an ID and still a control over who can get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You'd think people would get that point when you say license you just meant "they have to ID you when you buy them" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) OI MATE, YOU GOT A LOISENCE FOR THAT CIGGY? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Aye, i got the lie sense to get one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Aye, i got the lie sense to get one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, in so much as you need to prove you're above a certain age. The best way to do that (in the US) is with a driver's license. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lots of states issue IDs from the DMV with equivalent protection features as a driver's license, but isn't a license. Those are good enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not the specific driver's license that matters. The point is that it's still an ID and still a control over who can get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You'd think people would get that point when you say license you just meant "they have to ID you when you buy them" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lots of states issue IDs from the DMV with equivalent protection features as a driver's license, but isn't a license. Those are good enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not the specific driver's license that matters. The point is that it's still an ID and still a control over who can get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You'd think people would get that point when you say license you just meant "they have to ID you when you buy them" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not the specific driver's license that matters. The point is that it's still an ID and still a control over who can get it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You'd think people would get that point when you say license you just meant "they have to ID you when you buy them" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago You'd think people would get that point when you say license you just meant "they have to ID you when you buy them" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) You already need a license to buy other substances such as cigarettes, alcohol, prescription medication, etc. Where? You need an ID but not a license specifically where I'm from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I was referring specifically to the drivers license which is used in place of the standard ID. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sure but the license isn't to purchase those products. There is no licensing for them even though you typically use your license to prove your age. You can also use a passport or military ID or a standard state ID that looks exactly like a license but requires no test. A liquor license is to sell, not purchase. And for the record, I like your ideas but using something like a medical card for purchasing weed would have been a better example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with the medical card as well, but I wouldn't have any issues with it being done recreationally, I just think that if it is done recreationally it should still have a license associated with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Indubitably. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I was referring specifically to the drivers license which is used in place of the standard ID. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sure but the license isn't to purchase those products. There is no licensing for them even though you typically use your license to prove your age. You can also use a passport or military ID or a standard state ID that looks exactly like a license but requires no test. A liquor license is to sell, not purchase. And for the record, I like your ideas but using something like a medical card for purchasing weed would have been a better example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with the medical card as well, but I wouldn't have any issues with it being done recreationally, I just think that if it is done recreationally it should still have a license associated with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Indubitably. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Sure but the license isn't to purchase those products. There is no licensing for them even though you typically use your license to prove your age. You can also use a passport or military ID or a standard state ID that looks exactly like a license but requires no test. A liquor license is to sell, not purchase. And for the record, I like your ideas but using something like a medical card for purchasing weed would have been a better example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with the medical card as well, but I wouldn't have any issues with it being done recreationally, I just think that if it is done recreationally it should still have a license associated with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Indubitably. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with the medical card as well, but I wouldn't have any issues with it being done recreationally, I just think that if it is done recreationally it should still have a license associated with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Indubitably. permalink fedilink source parent