▲ 350 ▼ What are some companies that deserve to be boycotted to death? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by erik111189@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 333 comments fedilink hide all child comments So far my list includes Comcast, EA, and Nestle. Tell me yours, and I'll help out.
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) Even something like 30 years feel reasonable. It's insane how long it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago It used to be 19 years with the option to renew for another 19. Meaning if you didn't care, it went into the public domain after 19 years and if you did care, it went into the public domain after 38 years. That seems really reasonable to me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] detalferous@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is no value to society to have it last that long. And if there is no value to society, then the system should be changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* "Value to society" is not what rule-makers care about. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago It used to be 19 years with the option to renew for another 19. Meaning if you didn't care, it went into the public domain after 19 years and if you did care, it went into the public domain after 38 years. That seems really reasonable to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is no value to society to have it last that long. And if there is no value to society, then the system should be changed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* "Value to society" is not what rule-makers care about. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* "Value to society" is not what rule-makers care about. permalink fedilink source parent