this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Leftsthetics - Leftist Aesthetics

2157 readers
2 users here now

For propaganda posters, art, influential photos, and anything else that promotes the aesthetics of revolution and the Left.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Even more satisfying for the formerly homeless or destitute villagers living in hovels that were given units in these blocks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What time were these built? They are quite tall and colorful so I don't think they were during Khrushchev's era

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

According to urbanhell post it's around 2018 so pretty new. No link though, but this don't look like typical soviet district, the buildings are too dense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's interesting. The fact that capitalist developers are still building using the commieblock urban format nowadays proves how practical and functional it is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, even in Poland, where commieblock are constantly slandered in all media there are still new ones being build - albeit not in big numbers, and as an expesive condo blocks (oh the irony) for smaller burgies and bank slaves.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The high density unfortunately ruins the intial design intent of the Soviet microdistrict urban planning model. It's supposed to be spacious and interspersed with parks and trees. Russia is big enough that they didn't have to economize on space like this, unless it was built right in the middle of a city.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

I don't think so, Stavropol isn't smallest of cities, it's around 450000 people, but it's on the open terrain, there's a lot of place there. The picture is apparently a bit misleading though, at the ground level it looks much better and less dense according to the same posts.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)