this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

5 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

It's an incentive for devs to put their back catalogues to EGS, after they just laid off 800 employees because they spend too much money. Is it just me, or does everyone besides Epic know what the problem is with EGS?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I feel like EGS is a wash for anyone older than the elder Z generation. They might get the Fortnite kids to stick with em if said kids grow up and want to play anything else. Giving out free games is a way to solve the "all my games in one place" problem. If I started PC gaming 2 years ago on Fortnite and collected every free game I'd have about a hundred games in my library now., whereas I may not even have a Steam account.

The one true way to beat Steam would be to undercut them in price across the board but from what I hear Valve will ban your ass if you sell a game there for $70 but EGS at $50. (Full price, not on sale), so that's not an option at all which leaves it to exclusives, which wouldn't been as hated if Epic was publishing/funding them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, Valve requires price parity across platforms. Sales may or may not matter. The wording is vague enough that sales would in fact need to be paritied too but they don't seem to go after people for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

sales are supposed to matter. You aren't supposed to offer a bigger sale on another site than you will offer on steam in a reasonable time frame. Funny that never applied to the makers of the Witcher when they gave that away for free. I never saw valve force them to make it free on steam. What you'll find is a lot of steam's policies only apply to smaller indie devs, not big companies.

load more comments (9 replies)