No, I'm saying that any military strategy has to operate around it's own operational and environmental constraints, and the capabilities and obstacles of the opposing force.

Whatever you're opinions are on any conflict, you should still understand that rational actors will respond accordingly to their constraints.

Rational doesn't mean moral, it means they have a clear mission and objective, and a plan to achieve it.

You're suggesting that instead of being combat effective, they should instead suicide themselves by operating in an open field in close proximity, and with no cover, to a vastly superior force. That would be irrational.