this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

12 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I hate the software subscription model and the monopolisation happening around adobe and autodesk. I was very sad when they bought allegorithmic

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Nobody likes subscriptions but there's not really another good way to treat software as the living entity it is these days.

Monopolization needs to die in a fire though.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The old system worked fine. You bought a version and you get to keep it forever. You typically got a year of updates along with it. If your didn't want anything new ever, you were done. If you wanted more updates, you could buy another years worth typically with a nice discount. That way the customer chooses how much they need updates and the company gets paid for the updates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This. I'm totally for FOSS, but among four commercial apps that I use (SublimeText, SublimeMerge, Reaper and Bitwig), all four use this older model. You buy a period of free upgrades, but you may keep using the current version as long, as you wish. I see this model as beneficial for user and the company (providing them with money), but also encouraging it economically to continue developing the product. In the case of subscription-based model, I see little reason for the company to improve the product.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)