a post about how many nazis remained in positions of power is made, the op is called a tankie and people defend the decision to keep nazis around

hitler-detector

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Has anyone done any analysis on if Weimar’s collapse could be more closely tied to losing its colonies and still trying to be a social democracy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    That seems pretty dubious. They started their colonies 30 years before they lost WWI, I don't think they had enough time to extract enough to make a dent compared to their home industrialization

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Losing polish territories was more important in that process than the colonies. They were basically not held long enough and were only considered “prestige”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Yes, Greater Poland was economically significant and fairly densely populated, and Upper Silesia was one of the two most important industrial regions in Germany.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [B] 3 points 2 years ago*

    I was thinking more of the junker estates and west prussia, but yeah the loss of upper silesia caused an economic crisis in eastern Germany which is why the nazis picked up the votes there.

  • source
  • parent