▲ 315 ▼ Trump Attorney Screwup Means Trump Won’t Get Jury Trial in NY Fraud Case (www.meidastouch.com) submitted 2 years ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world 46 comments fedilink hide all child comments Due to an oversight, Trump's attorneys failed to ask for a jury trial within the time allotted to them
[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'll let the team over at Legal Eagle answer that one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) So, I must have followed a link to one of their videos at some point, because the YouTube algorithm spammed me their shit for months until I blocked it. What kind of content is it? The thumbnails and titles looked rage baity permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago It's actually pretty decent legal oriented YouTube entertainment. He's a practicing lawyer that talks about current events and discusses possibly relevant laws or sometimes legal procedures. Sort of a more serious version of attorney tom. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago It's pretty good. He definitely has a bias and I don't agree with him 100% of the time. For example, he advocates that forced arbitration agreements isn't that bad. I don't agree with that at all. But it's good content and high quality. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago He's actually pretty good. I really enjoy some of his reviews of legal movies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) So, I must have followed a link to one of their videos at some point, because the YouTube algorithm spammed me their shit for months until I blocked it. What kind of content is it? The thumbnails and titles looked rage baity permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago It's actually pretty decent legal oriented YouTube entertainment. He's a practicing lawyer that talks about current events and discusses possibly relevant laws or sometimes legal procedures. Sort of a more serious version of attorney tom. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago It's pretty good. He definitely has a bias and I don't agree with him 100% of the time. For example, he advocates that forced arbitration agreements isn't that bad. I don't agree with that at all. But it's good content and high quality. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago He's actually pretty good. I really enjoy some of his reviews of legal movies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago It's actually pretty decent legal oriented YouTube entertainment. He's a practicing lawyer that talks about current events and discusses possibly relevant laws or sometimes legal procedures. Sort of a more serious version of attorney tom. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago It's pretty good. He definitely has a bias and I don't agree with him 100% of the time. For example, he advocates that forced arbitration agreements isn't that bad. I don't agree with that at all. But it's good content and high quality. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago He's actually pretty good. I really enjoy some of his reviews of legal movies. permalink fedilink source parent