One of the big winners of the Unity debacle is the free and open source Godot Engine, which has seen its funding soar to a much more impressive level as Unity basically gave them free advertising.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 3 years ago (3 children)

You are not allowed to distribute unreal source. From their FAQ:

Unreal Engine licensees are permitted to post engine code snippets (up to 30 lines) in a public forum, but only for the purpose of discussing the content of the snippet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    But the code is easily visible and you can compile it yourself. If you say "I only run software I 100% knows what it does because I can read it's source code" then Unreal Engine fits, it's open source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    That's not why people want an open source game engine though, they want it to be open source so that they can't do a unity

    I agree the phrase "open source" is a bit confusing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    they want it to be open source so that they can’t do a unity

    That has nothing to do with open source, that has to to with licensing, which I'm pretty sure isn't an issue anyway since I think Unreal versions are tied to specific license versions, i.e. if you download the engine under one term, thats the only one you have to use

  • source
  • parent