▲ 287 ▼ Russia dismisses Ukraine peace plan: ‘Let’s decide it on the battlefield’ (www.scmp.com) submitted 2 years ago by fosforus@sopuli.xyz to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml 155 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not saying it's not going to happen but Russia would have to attack NATO first. No one wants to attack a nuclear power if they don't have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ours@lemmy.film 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) NATO directly fighting Russian troops in Ukraine would be a big deal and quite unlikely already if it somehow got to that. Russians need to be kicked out of Ukraine but they need to kick out Putin out of Russia themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It's anti-Democratic to interfere in the politics of other countries. And yes, the US has done it a lot, and tries to keep it hushed up because it's extremely wrong and unpopular behavior. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ours@lemmy.film 1 point 2 years ago First, why would NATO risk escalation and bother losing troops when they can get Ukraine to do all the actual fighting? permalink fedilink source parent [+] DmMacniel@feddit.de -6 points 2 years ago it would only be forthcoming. permalink fedilink source parent [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -25 points 2 years ago (1 child) How about DC? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@local106.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Whataboutism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -26 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is that whataboutism? Do you even know what that means or are you just a liberals parrot? Also... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@local106.com 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) This guy gets called on it enough to have a cartoon but not enough to reconsider his words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -16 points 2 years ago What did I say permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not saying it's not going to happen but Russia would have to attack NATO first. No one wants to attack a nuclear power if they don't have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ours@lemmy.film 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) NATO directly fighting Russian troops in Ukraine would be a big deal and quite unlikely already if it somehow got to that. Russians need to be kicked out of Ukraine but they need to kick out Putin out of Russia themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It's anti-Democratic to interfere in the politics of other countries. And yes, the US has done it a lot, and tries to keep it hushed up because it's extremely wrong and unpopular behavior. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ours@lemmy.film 1 point 2 years ago First, why would NATO risk escalation and bother losing troops when they can get Ukraine to do all the actual fighting? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ours@lemmy.film 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) NATO directly fighting Russian troops in Ukraine would be a big deal and quite unlikely already if it somehow got to that. Russians need to be kicked out of Ukraine but they need to kick out Putin out of Russia themselves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It's anti-Democratic to interfere in the politics of other countries. And yes, the US has done it a lot, and tries to keep it hushed up because it's extremely wrong and unpopular behavior. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ours@lemmy.film 1 point 2 years ago First, why would NATO risk escalation and bother losing troops when they can get Ukraine to do all the actual fighting? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] krolden@lemmy.ml -8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It's anti-Democratic to interfere in the politics of other countries. And yes, the US has done it a lot, and tries to keep it hushed up because it's extremely wrong and unpopular behavior. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ours@lemmy.film 1 point 2 years ago First, why would NATO risk escalation and bother losing troops when they can get Ukraine to do all the actual fighting? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago It's anti-Democratic to interfere in the politics of other countries. And yes, the US has done it a lot, and tries to keep it hushed up because it's extremely wrong and unpopular behavior. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ours@lemmy.film 1 point 2 years ago First, why would NATO risk escalation and bother losing troops when they can get Ukraine to do all the actual fighting? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DmMacniel@feddit.de -6 points 2 years ago it would only be forthcoming. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] krolden@lemmy.ml -25 points 2 years ago (1 child) How about DC? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@local106.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Whataboutism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -26 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is that whataboutism? Do you even know what that means or are you just a liberals parrot? Also... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@local106.com 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) This guy gets called on it enough to have a cartoon but not enough to reconsider his words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -16 points 2 years ago What did I say permalink fedilink source parent
[–] explodicle@local106.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Whataboutism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -26 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is that whataboutism? Do you even know what that means or are you just a liberals parrot? Also... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@local106.com 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) This guy gets called on it enough to have a cartoon but not enough to reconsider his words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -16 points 2 years ago What did I say permalink fedilink source parent
[+] krolden@lemmy.ml -26 points 2 years ago (1 child) How is that whataboutism? Do you even know what that means or are you just a liberals parrot? Also... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@local106.com 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) This guy gets called on it enough to have a cartoon but not enough to reconsider his words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -16 points 2 years ago What did I say permalink fedilink source parent
[–] explodicle@local106.com 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) This guy gets called on it enough to have a cartoon but not enough to reconsider his words. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] krolden@lemmy.ml -16 points 2 years ago What did I say permalink fedilink source parent