you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 3 years ago (6 children)

That's fine, but it seems disingenuous to use the general term 'health care' when you could be more specific with what that health care actually is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I don't think it's disingenuous at all. It's treatment for a woman's health. Calling out people for disapproving of health care is half the point.

    Abortion is health care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, you literally said to call it by a general term to get people to think a certain way about it.

    I feel like we should tell them the specific information and let them make their own decision instead of resorting to sly tricks like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    First off, when you say "isn't abortion" it kinda sounds like you're talking about mythical post-birth murder, which doesn't happen and would be illegal. Not sure if you're talking about that or not, but I thought I'd preface.

    Aside from that, when it's "viable" it's usually just induced labor. If it's not induced, there's a reason why they have to take more extreme measures.

    Aside from that, if you give an inch they take a mile. I would rather doctors and their patient be able to do what's best for the patient's health than to let the government interfere.

  • source
  • parent