this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
115 points (96.7% liked)

Apple

17455 readers
244 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: USB-C AirPods Pro support lossless audio with the upcoming Vision Pro headset due to the 5GHz band support in their H2 chip. The previous version only had 2.4GHz.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (16 children)

TL;DR There is enough bandwidth in 2.4GHz, but fuck you consumer, buy more AirPods.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

According to Wikipedia the theoretical max bandwidth on the 2.4GHz bandwidth is 706,25 kbit/s downstream.

I don’t have data from Apple, but Qualcomms lossless Bluetooth audio transmits up to 1Mb/s.

So, a three minute internet search supports rather apples story than yours.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow. Not only incorrect, but incorrect in the worst way by fucking up maths by a factor of a thousand!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What math? There is no math in there. I typed 1 unit incorrectly. One that didn’t actually matter for the argument.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But he did his own research! Checkmate!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Should I rather trust a random naysayer on the internet? I haven’t heard yet his numbers or sources, even. My argument still stands after the correction of a unit.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)