▲ 712 ▼ Sorry for the inconvenience (sh.itjust.works) submitted 3 years ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/memes@lemmy.ml 65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 years ago (15 children) Pretty much this size permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] urinnerchild87@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we're using references. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (3 children) 2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Johandea@feddit.nu -1 points 3 years ago (2 children) Can you please start using real units. Seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago It's the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8". permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago No. 2.5" is in real units already. What's your problem with size comparisons? permalink fedilink source parent [–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) They should just refer to the caliber permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dodslaser@feddit.nu 3 points 3 years ago I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds permalink fedilink source parent [–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (7 children) Relevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (6 children) I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago Relevant username permalink fedilink source parent [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) 2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) 1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago That doesn't sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm permalink fedilink source parent [–] PickTheStick@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] urinnerchild87@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we're using references. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (3 children) 2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Johandea@feddit.nu -1 points 3 years ago (2 children) Can you please start using real units. Seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago It's the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8". permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago No. 2.5" is in real units already. What's your problem with size comparisons? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (3 children) 2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Johandea@feddit.nu -1 points 3 years ago (2 children) Can you please start using real units. Seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago It's the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8". permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago No. 2.5" is in real units already. What's your problem with size comparisons? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Johandea@feddit.nu -1 points 3 years ago (2 children) Can you please start using real units. Seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago It's the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8". permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago No. 2.5" is in real units already. What's your problem with size comparisons? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago It's the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago No. 2.5" is in real units already. What's your problem with size comparisons? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) They should just refer to the caliber permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dodslaser@feddit.nu 3 points 3 years ago I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dodslaser@feddit.nu 3 points 3 years ago I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (7 children) Relevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (6 children) I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago Relevant username permalink fedilink source parent [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) 2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) 1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago That doesn't sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm permalink fedilink source parent [–] PickTheStick@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (6 children) I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago Relevant username permalink fedilink source parent [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) 2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) 1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago That doesn't sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm permalink fedilink source parent [–] PickTheStick@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) 2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) 1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago That doesn't sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm permalink fedilink source parent [–] PickTheStick@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) 1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 years ago That doesn't sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PickTheStick@ttrpg.network 1 point 3 years ago Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet? permalink fedilink source parent
