you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 95 points 9 hours ago (12 children)

I thought maybe he meant that taxing them would anger the billionaires and more mass surveillance is just what they do when they're angry, but no. He just means surveillance of billionaire's bank accounts. I'm not sure that really counts as "mass."

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

    Every time I deposit more than $600 cash I’m getting monitored. These fuckers have no clue how we live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    In the 60 Minutes interview, when the interviewer reminded Trump his wealth had increased by $3 billion, Trump immediately shot back "Well, so did everyone's." I dont think they even remember that non-billionaires exist, and if they do they don't consider it important.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 7 hours ago

    And that's just the mandated monitoring -- it doesn't include the monitoring that businesses and banks are doing for free, on their own.

    I hear rumors that many places are rolling out systems to record and track the serial number of every bill of cash that goes in or out, because they can sell that information to big data collectors who can use it to piece together a picture of where cash flows -- previously the only flow of money they couldn't completely monitor. And, of course, that big data is available to the government at any time, either by buying it or by getting a friendly judge to sign off on sweeping warrants.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (5 children)

    And monitored it should be.

    Once a person has enough wealth that affects, say, more than 50 "unaffiliated" (non-family member/dependant/immediate circle, not including employees) people's lives, their finances should be as transparent as aquarium glass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

    Don't complicate stuff, just treat wealth like income. In fact let's change income tax to income and wealth tax. Same department, same operations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (2 children)

    That would backfire considerably for the average people...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • how would you define "affects people's lives"? because hiring a yard work company and replacing your roof could potentially be contracting 50 people (it shouldn't be more than 30 but I've seen the exact Mexican immigrants Trump probably hates working as a family in roofing where the entire family does the job all at once)

  • source
  • parent