For me the good points were about avoiding unhelpful purism and being compassionate with people who were pushed to using genAI for understandable reasons. I found it helpful for being patient with loved ones who aren't quite the firebrand that I am.

As far as your problem is concerned, I'd say don't bother. If you are forced to interact with AI for economic reasons, I think it's healthier to be proper pissed about it rather than some forced conciliatory bullshit.

I just watched her "Final Thoughts" section and I think the key message is:

The world today is scary. The current direction of the tech industry is scary. The horrifying ways in which the rise of fascism in the United States is intertwined with the proliferation of AI is fucking scary. And I feel all that anxiety that the AI ethicist lady and so many of you are feeling.

And I don't want us to be doomers about this. If you've seen anything I've ever made about politics, then you know how stubbornly hopeful I am about our potential to work towards a better future, no matter how cataclysmically dire things may seem at present. (And when it comes to AI, shit be looking dire). But I am begging you to please direct that anxiety or rage or whatever it is you're feeling towards the systems that are causing the problems. The companies that are profiting off dangerous technology built at the expense of our environment and communities. The governments that are allowing this in exchange for more powerful military and surveillance capabilities. And the systems that make people so atomized and desperate that they're willing to use it even given the immense harm we all know it causes.

So let's get educated and let's educate. Let's organize and let's resist. But let's also have some empathy. Let's offer support rather than shun. Let's direct our anger up and not across. Because if we want any chance of pushing back on the technofascist empires trying to take over our lives, we need to do it together.