Capitalism is the most rational system

Pictured: The movie he's very proud of producing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

With cbs, paramount, etc —do these weirdos still want to make money? Or is this all just vanity projects now… because how do they keep reading the room so incorrectly… DC cu is a dog—it’s pretty much just Batman and the Gunn movies that got any buzz, the rest are flops.

Maybe it’s a money laundering op.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 59 minutes ago (2 children)

    The company, now called "Skydance", is owned by David Ellison. This is over the anti-Nazi and anti-genocide themes in Gunn's works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 52 minutes ago

    Yeah I get that the ellisons want to reshape these services and punish those they see as critical of isreal, so I suppose to them it’s ok for it to be a loss financially, but like with oracle going out on a limb with AI debt and their essential destruction of CBS news as any kind of new source, like at what point do they not start circling the drain with this stuff. I hate capeshit movies at this point, but even I know that marvel has consistently eaten DCs lunch with the movies. The James Gunn ones (I think I watched suicide squad 2 and Superman on flights) were at least watchable and seemed to be moderately successful after their post Nolan/dark knight overcorrection into the “gritty comic” Zach synder era of garbage…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 3 hours ago*

    the Evangelical Christian Cinematic Universe is generally regarded as an untapped market by these people. there is a whole demographic of households that can only watch The Hallmark Channel, listen to "Christian" labeled music, and content from the Angel Network family. they don't watch anything mainstream, because it might have LGBTQ content, deny Christ, or portray an interracial relationship not being lead by a strong, white, male head of household.

    the production companies that do cater to these people can churn out literal garbage and they retain a captive audience no matter how piss poor the production and final products are.

    i think its a miscalculation on their part to expand the platform from its highly profitable, concentrated niche into major networks and IP. they don't have the audience to sustain a more broad landscape. however, media companies are a bit of a vanity asset anyway for the megarich. if they can get it to break even operationally, there's the intangible value of exerting control over what people see and hear, from cultural products to direct propaganda.

  • source
  • parent