I'm trying to adjust expectations. You aren't getting my approval unless you can explain why each part is there. Your poor planning is not my emergency. K.I.S.S. still applies.

Admittedly, this is easier to say as a senior whose opinion is respected within the company.

If they push shit, I push back. It's a tool they can use, not an excuse. Creating rules for the agent is fine, but that's only a soft guardrail.

We don't have a mandate to use LLMs, if things are worse with them then we won't use them.

As a senior dev... AI actually improved the code we wrote in my last job. Mind you the codebase was in a shite position (tons of technical debt, plague-like avoidance of inline comments because "all of that knowledge is on Jira/Notion" except it wasn't; lots of legacy code, undocumented weird behaviours, everyone was doing their own coding style without regards to the rest of the codebase and so on).

With controlled AI contributions, we've managed to:

• refactor large chunks of code where the overall high level logic didn't need to change, but the underlying tooling did (e.g. lots of UI layers got rewritten from a very early attempt at a standardised MVVM approach to a well defined MVI one, we've also managed to eliminate the remaining RxJava/RxKotlin legacy flows to replace them with Coroutines)
• UI layers got refactored in no time because the AI agent was able to convert them appropriately (and even fixed a handful of UI bugs)
• a handful of core monoliths (yes I know... I hated working with them as well, but we never had the chance to properly refactor) got split up into more manageable, vertical-specific domain controllers without breaking
• the elimination of a legacy overarching component that was estimated at 6 months, got reduced to 6 weeks
• unit test coverage skyrocketed because even if the code was hand-written, an agent would provide coverage, based not just on implementation but on intention (and adoption of TDD/BDD finally started spreading).

Meanwhile code quality improved because we've had well established patterns and styles defined in the agent instructions, and even the anti-documentation "pragmatists" got shut up when they finally understood that the AI works better if there's fucking comments to explain what's going on

Didn't say "good with it", I said "being good*.

5 years ago the complaint was people copy pasting from stack overflow without care. Those people now push without care.

We're harmmaxxing!

Throwing around the word slop just devalues it.

Slop has a meaning and it does NOT equal harm.