False accusation is one of the more difficult things to write laws for, because it's very difficult to prove. IE the problem is defining honest reasonable suspicions from blatent attacks... and differentiating cannot prove it from proven innocent. Perhaps in shoplifting I don't care, but in other aspects of life, say rape or violence that I actually do care about. We don't want someone to not report serious crimes because if they can't prove beyond reasonable doubt the person is guilty, they open themselves up to the law swinging the other way. So it can't directly be provably guilty that makes the line, which then goes to intent. Is the accuser making a reasonable claim that merits opening an investigation, or maliciously getting it wrong on purpose, which is almost impossible to prove one way or the other beyond them being dumb enough to brag about it on social media.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
replies: