you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

And I used both a philological and a philosophical argument. So both a scientific one and one that didn't pretend to be scientific (but can be true nonetheless).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 21 minutes ago (1 child)

    what's that philological argument? "Trust me bro"? The cambridge dictionary's definition of the word omnipotent is literally

    having unlimited power and able to do anything

    It both is the most common definition of the word, and the most logical one, based off its components literal meaning, whereas yours is dubious, misleading and requires you to define the "maximum power". In other words its inferior according to the Occam's Razor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment